Answers:
His "bad artist" tries to reproduce an existing work, concentrating on the composition, technique, and palette of the earlier artist, letting the inevitable variations in ability chowcase the differences. The overall effect is "See how close I can come to Rembrandt's technique!".
His "great artist" doesn't worry about the technical trifles -- he's already mastered the ones he uses, and ignores the others. He lifts the existing work as a quotation, and incorporates it into a different vision, using the earlier work as nothing more than a recognizable element of an independent artistic expression.
this is just what i think, bad artist copy exactly everything, while on the other hand 'great' artist steal the concept and turn it into something better
The concept of his quote is, a bad artist reproduces what is already there in form of style technique and so on, A great artist takes others concepts and makes it his own.
IT's pretty easy, see, BAD artists merely take some art and copy it outright, line for line so nothing is different, just a copy.
Now an ARTIST, like, say Dali (get onto his web collections and see this,by the way, he was a WONDERFUL artist), would take the original.and...tweak it, change something so that it was uniquely THIERS.
Dali's take on Rembrandt's self portrait is a good illustration, it looks exactly like Rembrandts own, but Dali added his own 'elements' to it.
It may be a something done before, but the true artist will make it thier own just the same. Just as I took Michaelangelos portait of the pope, copied it exactly..except he wasn't reading the bible,he was reading a girlie mag (you could see the legs).
truly fun.
This article contents is post by this website user, EduQnA.com doesn't promise its accuracy.
More Questions & Answers...